Site Navigation
  Beginner Skating Videos Competitions Tips
  Steps and Moves Jumps Spins News

Custom Search

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

An analysis of my performance at Singapore and Malaysia Nationals

It was quite interesting comparing my scores at the Singapore Nationals in Mar and the Malaysia Nationals in April. Here's a quick analysis (results sheet below)...

Axel combination
In both competitions, my opening 1A+1Lo+1T all became a +COMBO. *sigh* I really need to land my Axel clean, even if I am 1ft from the wall. What kind of choreography puts the Axel there anyway!?? Hopefully this program will fit better in a full size rink :-)

Spiral sequence
I was ultimately disappointed that my spiral sequence was only called as a Level 1 at the Singapore Nationals. However, having looked at the video, I realised that I really didn't hold any of the positions long enough to get any features.

So, when I went to the Malaysia Nationals last weekend, I determined to hold my spirals for "long enough". However, my last spiral started to slip, and I had to let go. Though I wasn't that proud of the overall spiral sequence, I am pleased to see that it is now called as a level 3. (it is almost as if there is now some verification of the logic)

Sit spin
The plan was for a sit-backsit - after all, that would pick up more base points. However, my backsit isn't exactly the best, and with competition "stress" it really doesn't go low enough to be a sit at all! At the Singapore Nationals, I "chickened out" and did just the forward sit. At the Malaysia Nationals, I thought, why not attempt the change of foot.

What happened? I picked up a couple of +1 GOE for my nice low simple forward sit spin at the Singapore Nationals, while the attempt at a not-good backsit at the Malaysia Nationals set me back with a -2 GOE! The final score for the sit spin with change of foot ended up lower than that for the plain ol' sit spin.

This is such a classic example of "don't try to do too much, rather do what you can well". Trust me to have to put it to test!

The overall program felt terrible in both competitions, but for different reasons. The lack of practise at the Singapore Nationals showed just halfway through the program - I had no more energy for my jumps! At the Malaysia Nationals, I was actually feeling much better stamina-wise, but was kind of thrown off by the rink size and where the judges were sitting. Plus, I was a little taken aback when I found myself in preparation for a second flip right after doing one. I really should have gone ahead and done the second one, except that I was too busy wondering if I actually did the first one!

In any case, I have to focus on my next competition - Oberstdorf. This one should be a lot more fun!


Mrs Redboots (Annabel Smyth) said...

Looks like you're well on your way back. The IJS was designed to reward lower elements done well as against higher elements done badly, only the elite skaters don't seem to realise that. Sigh.

Longing to see you! We're coming to Oberstdorf to watch, so will see you there; are you doing Mountain Cup, too?

Anonymous said...


Actually, if you go look at everyone else's detailed scores from Singapore National, all combination jumps are with +COMBO. I did data entry for the judges and actually asked the Technical Specialist why. She said it's to make the identification of Sequence (+SEQ) jumps and Combination (+COMBO) jumps easier.

However, I'm not sure why it's not done the same way at competitions like the 4 Continents.

Keep skating well!

Chow said...

eniq, thanks, you're absolutely right! The +COMBO really didn't dock any points from the base value. I got a bit confused there ;-)

Chow said...

Annabel, I won't be doing MC this year. Looking forward to seeing you and Robert at O'dorf, though! :-)